Plumy Cranberry Sauce

plumy-cranberry-sauce-1

Adding local ingredients to a traditional recipe is a great way to develop unique regional flavors.

This recipe is safe for someone on the Specific Carbohydrate Diet, GAPS or the modified paleo diet.

This Thanksgiving I didn’t have enough cranberries to make enough sauce to satisfy my family. It looked like I was going to have to make a last minute trip to the grocery store. I’ve made it a habit to always look around the house for possible substitutes before jumping into the car. By thinking before acting, I save time and money.

Since we had a bumper crop of prune plums this year, finding interesting ways to use plums has become a priority. I knew plums produce a beautiful red color when cooked so I decided to try adding the plums to the cranberry sauce. Using plums we grow on the property means the cranberries we have to buy go further, which saves our family money.

Plumy Cranberry Sauce

1c garden prune plums, frozen
1c organic cranberries, frozen
2/3c filtered water
1/2tsp sea salt
1-2T raw local honey
In a sauce pan, simmer the plums, cranberries and sea salt in the filtered water for 20-30 minutes until the cranberries burst. Remove from the heat and allow the sauce to cool down. Add the honey one tablespoon at a time and stir very well. This is easier if the sauce is still warm. Be careful not to add too much honey. Chill before serving. This sauce goes well with turkey, chicken or pork.

plumy-cranberry-sauce-2

Using plums we grow on the property means the cranberries we have to buy go further which saves our family money.

Why does society need to pay $45,000 to glean FREE fruit?

falling-fruit-1

Fruit is falling all over Kamloops. It’s so sad to see all the fruit going to waste. But things could get more wasteful. The State could get involved!

I have been reading a essay called What is Seen and What is Not Seen by Frederic Bastiat. Bastiat says: “There is only one difference between a bad economist and a good one: the bad economist confines himself to the visible effect; the good economist takes into account both the effects that can be seen and those effects that must be foreseen.” He goes on to say: “the bad economist pursues a small present good that will be followed by a great evil to come, while the good economist pursues a great good to come, at the risk of a small present evil.”

So what does that have to do with $45,000 in public money for FREE fruit? Actually, quite a bit since there is a new gleaning project coming to Kamloops called the Gleaning Abundance Project. Using Bastiat’s method, I would like to show how this government gleaning project is wrongheaded.

Even though I completely support local food and local food security, both of these goals may be undermined by this government sponsored gleaning project. Bastiat would take an issue like this and say: “Let us accustom ourselves, then, not to judge things solely by what is seen, but rather by what is not seen.”

Here is what is seen:

  1. The happy homeowner has their yard clean for free of unwanted fruit.
  2. The happy volunteer gets free fruit for their volunteer labor.
  3. The happy volunteer gets free training in fruit picking.
  4. A few happy community organizations get free fruit.
  5. One happy Gleaning Project Manager gets a part-time job.

Here is what is unseen:

  1. The unhappy taxpayers pay for clean yards, free training, and fruit for other people. The unhappy taxpayers do not get clean yards, free fruit, or training for himself or herself.
  2. The unhappy taxpayers pay an unknown amount in tax. The government bureaucracy gets an unknowable amount from the unhappy taxpayers before the bureaucracy gives back a fraction of the money as a $45,000 grant for gleaning.
  3. We will never know what the taxpayers would have done with the money that went for taxation. If the tax money had not been collected by the government in the first place, the taxpayers would have spent the money on a multitude of voluntary transactions. Maybe the taxpayers would have bought food from a local farmer with the money. We will never know what the taxpayers would have done with the money if it hadn’t been liberated by the government for taxation.
  4. Local farmers may find their sales of fruit reduced. Farmers have a hard time competing against government subsidized “free fruit” flooding the market, picked with volunteer labor.
  5. What’s the true cost per pound of that government subsidized fruit? We will never know because government funded boondoggles never have to justify their costs. I can’t tell you the cost, but I can guarantee it won’t be FREE.

I’m all for local food. Reducing and eliminating waste is a personal goal of mine, but I don’t approve of using public money for such a cause. If the gleaning was done without public money and by volunteers, I would have nothing against the program. I would fully support the cause.

The government shouldn’t be spending public money on gleaning fruit. Leave it to the citizens of the community to organize themselves to collect the fruit, if they want to. Part of learning how to be self-sufficient is gaining skills by doing-it-yourself, not by having some government functionary doing all the thinking and organizing. Getting to know your neighbors is like developing an informal mutual aid society. Local food security comes from regular people building relationships with neighbors and changing the way they operate their household, not from a government functionary.

Leave government funding for public safety, honest courts, and protecting private property. Government needs to focus on these basic needs and leave more money in the pockets of taxpayers. By doing so, real needs of citizens will be fulfilled by the marketplace through voluntary transactions rather than wasting the productivity of citizens on government boondoggles.

In closing Bastiat states: “If you wish to create a government office, prove its usefulness.” I for one, am not convinced that gleaning fruit with government money is useful.

falling-fruit-2

Leave the tax money in the pockets of citizens. The State has no business gleaning fruit on private property. Let citizens solve the bountiful fruit problem themselves. This citizen is offering “FREE TREE TREATS” to anyone that passes by and it won’t cost the taxpayer $45,000!

“Let us never forget that, in fact, the state has no resources of its own. It has nothing, it possesses nothing that it does not take from the workers. When, then, it meddles in everything, it substitutes the deplorable and costly activity of its own agents for private activity.”
Property and Law by Frederic Bastiat

Trick or Treat: Earthships and Zero Energy Homes

earthship-lone-butt

Here is an earthship being built near Lone Butt, BC. It would be great if government would change regulations to allow easier construction of sustainable housing. Photo from Biotecture.

At the beginning of this year I wrote Boxing Day: You Are What You Buy (Believe) and Dreaming In the New Year. As I have said before, if we are going to save ourselves and our children, we each have to make some big decisions about how we live our lives.

Every day we make a decision about the foods we eat and its source. This one action can have a profound impact on our lives and the world we share with others. People talk about “voting with your food dollar” which can be a powerful way to live your beliefs and in fact changes the world around you. Buying locally produced organic food, pasture based animals, and getting reacquainted with your kitchen will change your world. You will be healthier, your children will have a healthier future, and your local farmer and rancher will benefit from your financial support.

Another big area we can look at after dealing with our food is housing. I was listening to David Suzuki on CBC Radio. David Suzuki is putting on a ten part series called The Bottom Line. He was talking about Climate Change and what we can do about it. I found his solution sadly lacking in imagination. His solution was to have more government regulations and force people to behave in an enlightened way. He seems to distrust the wisdom of his neighbors to do the right thing. Of course, sometimes it is the state that does not allow us to do the right thing even though we might like to as individuals.

There are a number experimental housing options that could potentially help us save the world by reducing our carbon footprint. But building bylaws and regulations will not allow these houses to be built. The Earthship is one such solution but you would have a tough time getting your local planning department to accept your plans to build a house that will collect its own water, make its own power, heat and cool itself, and process its own waste. The house will even grow your food all year round and it is made out of garbage that will otherwise end up in the landfill. Sounds wonderful doesn’t it?

Unfortunately, to build this house you will need an “overseeing professional” such as an engineer, assuming you can even find one that will take on your project. You will have extra costs and frustrations. It is always easier for the officials to say no to a request. Officials are not known for sticking out their necks for the little guy.

So I say to David Suzuki maybe less state control rather than more regulation will get us going in the direction we need to go as a society. I know a great number of people willing to make big changes in their lives if we were allowed to do so. I know I have extra raw milk I could sell to interested neighbors. I have a chicken or two I could slaughter in my kitchen sink for a friend. There is lots of food available but the state’s system of control stymie these simple activities and turns citizens into criminals. Of course, their argument is that it is for your own good because you are too ignorant to design your own food system.

I would like to build a zero energy house on a property where I could grow my own food and sell any extra food to my community. Earthships intrigue me. But the reality is these buildings need to be built near cities and towns so the garbage does not have to be shipped long distances into the woods. Unfortunately, the only place these building can be built would be in the bush, far away from the watchful eyes of the officials. (If you are out in the bush, using reinforced concrete or compressed earth blocks instead of the tire walls makes more sense.)

In my more cynical moments, I have little hope that we can free ourselves from the tyranny of the state. I fear that my children will walk in a world with even more restrictions from Above. I would like to see more freedom for the individual to solve their own problems without the state interfering with its steel fist and jack boots. Why can’t the state allow me to live in a garbage and mud house, if I so desire? Why can’t I grow and sell my food to my neighbors without restriction? I do not see these actions as criminal, but they have become so. I do not know if earthships are the answer to Climate Change or housing the poor, but these buildings are a step in the right direction.

darfield-earthship

This is inside the earthship being built in Darfield, BC. Photo by Sandra Burkholder.

If you would like to look at more examples of zero energy homes such as straw bale and rammed earth houses, here are just a few Architectural websites about straw bale construction and compressed earth construction. There is an earthship being built in Darfield, BC.

Eating Local Challenges: Part I

backyard-garden

It's hard to believe that growing our own food has become a radical act. Just a generation ago, growing your own food was the norm. Photo courtesy of www.aholliday.com.

There are a number of eating local challenges. One is called the 100 Mile Thanksgiving which challenges people to eat a local Thanksgiving dinner. The 100 Mile Diet is a more permanent change towards local eating.

I have mixed feelings about this movement. On one side, eating local is a great idea. Challenging your family to local eating for a period of time can be a great learning experience for the modern industrial eater. It allows the family to learn how dependent we have become on imported foods from around the world. Eating local for a period of time helps the family to find all of the great local food sources. This can be a fun experience.

But in the hands of a zealous person, local eating can be expensive and unnecessarily restrictive. It could make people feel guilty if they cannot live up to some high artificial restriction. Some people might quit in frustration while others “cheat” on the program and feel “bad” about not living up to some ideal. At worst, it can turn human tragedy into some kind of game. It makes “fun” of the real poverty and starvation faced by a billion people on our planet that must eat locally or die trying.

If you like to watch this type of program, which dramatizes the human condition though the distorted lens of reality TV, I have a link for you. Here is a commercial for a show coming soon to a TV near you: 100 Mile Diet in Mission, BC.

If you decide to do your own local food challenge and want to avoid these common pit falls, a good “acid test” might be a simple question. Are you having fun and learning something about yourself or are you feeling pressured and frustrated? Don’t let our society’s distorted ideals of achievement destroy a good idea.

Update April 26, 2009:
Path to Freedom has announced a new challenge called the 100 Foot Diet. The idea is to eat from your property. For more information and tips about growing your own food go to: 100 Foot Diet Challenge. I can dig it!
In our society, growing food yourself has become the most radical of acts. It is truly the only effective protest, one that can – and will – overturn the corporate powers that be. By the process of directly working in harmony with nature, we do the one thing most essential to change the world – we change ourselves.
Jules Dervaes

What’s a Mother to Do?

quiche-pork-salad

How do we save money during hard times? Will eating cheap convenience foods really work for our families?

This morning CBC Sirius Radio had an interview with Richard Florida. I read one of his books a few years ago called: The Rise of the Creative Class. The interview was focused on how society needs to change to weather the economic situation facing Canada and the world. It was an interesting conversation, but I found it had little to offer the individual family facing hard times.

So, what can a mother do? Most household finances can tighten up, but one place that I do not recommend cutting corners is nutritious food. Having a healthy body and mind is the best defense against changing times. This is doubly true for children. Children’s bodies are growing. What your children eat in the first 15 years of their lives will definitely set the stage for a successful future. During these times of change, a mom can help by feeding her family the most nutritious food possible. Cut out the processed food and junk food and eat nutritious real food. Doing this one change, may save your family money by avoiding the cost of drugs and lost of income from sickness. The Weston A. Price Foundation has guidelines on what not to eat in Dietary Dangers.

Our children sometimes complain that we are not eating like everyone else. But I know the money I spend on seasonal local foods is well worth it. As I get to know more about the wonderful local food sources, I am able to feed my family the best quality food available at a reasonable price. As a result of eating local seasonal foods, my family does not get sick very often anymore and we have a happy family life. Making a habit of eating a nutritious breakfast and dinner together are now some of my happiest family times. If you would like more tips on how to bring more local seasonal foods into your family’s diet read: Getting the Goods: Top Ten Tips.